An Interview with Daniel Pinchbeck in Ever Manifesto

  |   Interviews   |   14 Comments

Recently I was profiled by Ever Manifesto, distributed in H&M stores.

The Bigger Picture: Daniel Pinchbeck
by Xerxes Cook

An American philosopher and author who believes the economic systems humanity has created have the potential to act as remedies to the environmental chaos our planet is witnessing today, here, Daniel Pinchbeck discusses ideas of corporate alchemy and whether the ecological crisis is an initiatory process that will lead to the next stage of human evolution.

It’s been seven years since you wrote 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl, in which you concluded that the end of the Mayan calendar would mark a period of transition from “ego-based materialism, alienation and individuation” towards the next stage of human evolution which recognises the inter-connected nature of life… Please could you tell us how these ideas have developed in the book you are working on now?

In my new book Metamorphosis: A New Operating System for Human Society, I am thinking about the process of how we move from our current civilisation, based on hierarchy and ecological decimation, to a new social operating system based on mutual aid, with an integrated world view. One of the big inspirations is Buckminster Fuller’s work. In Utopia or Oblivion, Fuller argued that humanity has a choice: either we construct a situation where we maximise our efficient use of resources, and redesign our socio-technical industrial systems to support and educate everybody to become comprehensively successful as a species. Or we will fail together and annihilate ourselves. And I think if we look at what’s happening with the ecological crisis, Fuller’s ideas make sense. My view is that the ecological crisis is potentially an initiatory process for humanity, that’s going to force us to awake to our inherent solidarity as a species, and shift from our sense of separate identities to being aware of ourselves as constituting a planetary super organism that is in a symbiotic relationship with the planetary ecology as a whole.
My question is, can you do alchemy on the Corporations to turn them from poisons into medicines?

If cash rules everything around us, how can we redesign the financial systems we’ve created?

Corporate alchemy. It is this idea drawn from the alchemical principle that poisons can be medicines if taken at the right dose, and that the more powerful a poison is, the stronger a medicine it might be. So if corporations at the moment are extremely disruptive and often have a negative impact on the planet, it is because they are so powerful, because they are such incredible machines for taking ideas, energy and information and manifesting them. So my question is, can you do alchemy on the corporations to turn them from poisons into medicines?

My view is that the ecological crisis is potentially an initiatory process for humanity, that’s going to force us to awake to our inherent solidarity as a species, and shift from our sense of separate identities to being aware of ourselves as constituting a planetary super organism that is in a symbiotic relationship with the planetary ecology as a whole.

So it’s not the fault of corporations, but that they have been geared towards operating in a system which rewards the maximum return of profits above all else?

Exactly. That’s the problem — as much as we see efforts from corporations to become more sustainable and more mindful, if they’re publicly traded, they’re still locked into the system where they ultimately have to maximise shareholder value. We can look at the corporation as an artificial life form, that we have constructed out of legal code, ideas, brand logos and so on; and we have injected that artificial life form into a game, the stock market. And the problem with the game of the stock market is that it has only one way to win, which is to maximise pure monetary profit for shareholders. Ultimately we require a fundamental restructuring of the financial system to launch a regenerative planetary culture.

Can we consider the emergence of the sharing economy as capitalism at its finest — a group of people exercising their free will to do what they think is best for them, which is to collectively share their resources?

I think, with the sharing economy you’re seeing the beginning of this transformation, where you can utilise the tools of the system we’ve constructed and build a new system from within it, that rewards different behaviour patterns and values. The trend away from ownership is a big piece of that.

What does conscious consumerism mean to you — is self-sacrifice inherent to conscious consumerism?

I believe that people must understand that we’re in a planetary emergency, and there is an alternative — it’s just a fairly radical one. They’re going to want to commit themselves to bringing about the level of transformation that’s necessary. In the interim, we can think about things like conscious consumerism. Ultimately, we can transition to Cradle to Cradle practices, redesigning the industrial manufacturing system so that everything we make is powered by renewables, and feeds back productively and beneficially to the ecosystem. If we reach that point, everybody could consume all they want.

Can we consider businesses to be natural creations of Gaia — the idea that all living and non-living components on Earth work together to promote life?

If we take this idea that humanity constitutes a planetary super-organism in a symbiotic relationship with the whole Earth as a system, then we can consider this organism to have a body, and ask, what are the organs of that body? If you think about it, the organs of that body are corporations. For instance, energy companies are like the blood, sanitation companies are the liver and kidneys, the media companies are like the perceptual mechanisms and cognitive functions and so on.

If Walmart became cooperatively owned by its workers and stakeholders, grew organic food on its rooftop gardens, developed on-site manufacturing using non-destructive materials powered by renewable energy, offered continuing education and childcare for all of its workers, I might buy stock.

GAIA THEORY

Much of Daniel Pinchbeck’s philosophy of the ecological crisis being an initiatory process for humanity — a rite of passage we must endure in order to “awaken our inherent solidarity as a species” — is based on James Lovelock and Lynn Margolis’ Gaia hypothesis. First posited in the late 1960s, the theory proposes that living organisms and their inorganic surroundings have evolved together as a single living system that greatly affects the chemistry and conditions of the Earth’s surface, ranging from global temperature and atmospheric content to ocean salinity, in a quasi-automatic, self-regulating manner as if the Earth were a living organism itself. gaiatheory.org

Now if you look at the process of evolution, it goes through stages; immature ecosystems are characterised by aggression and competition. But as ecosystems mature, they are much more marked by symbiosis, cooperation and mutual aid. An example of this is our own bodies, which are made of trillions and trillions of cells and micro-organisms, that were once competing for resources, that somehow through a series of crises figured out how to work together and create organs, blood, bones and so on, and weave themselves into a body to maximise their own potential for success.
But obviously, to get from competition to cooperation will require a fundamental redesign of our economic system. And I think that’s going to be necessary at some point. In the near term, if we look at a process that’s been going on for quite a while now, there’s a counterculture which constructs narratives, images, means of revolution, transformation, sexual liberation, magic and so on. The energy of the counterculture often gets co-opted, corrupted, and used by the corporate system to sell stuff. In the future I believe we will see a creative synthesis, where the counterculture that seeks human liberation melds with the corporate infrastructure to bring about a transformation of our world from within.
In the future I believe we will see a creative synthesis, where the counterculture that seeks human liberation melds with the corporate infrastructure to bring about a transformation of our world from within.

So is it a situation where to be simply against something is not useful — that you need to be able to state your desired alternative?
Rather than boycotting companies you disagree with, to work in collaboration with them to show the ways forward? We have to think in terms of transitional strategies and ultimate goals. I think that corporations are going to be hamstrung, if they are publicly traded, by the need to maximise shareholder value. Still, in the interim, if a Coke or a Walmart transitions to a certain level of sustainability, it has a big impact on the planet. Down the line, if Walmart became cooperatively owned by its workers and stakeholders, grew organic food on its rooftop gardens, developed on-site manufacturing using non-destructive materials powered by renewable energy, offered continuing education and childcare for all of its workers, I might buy stock.

To contribute to Daniel’s crowdfunding campaign to publish Metamorphosis: A New Operating System for Human Society, visit danielpinchbeck.net

 

14 Comments
  • Jeff Marlow | Jun 7, 2014 at 12:03 am

    Attempting to restructure society or the world via a new and improved blueprint that recognizes the interconnectedness of life is futile until the collective soul is healed. Until the time when compassion, forgiveness, kindness and respect for others, and reverence for the environment define the animus mundi, any attempt to alter human behavior simply becomes an exercise in window dressing. Corporate alchemy, for example, can transform the corporation only when the corporate soul is healed,. and the individual gives equal or greater priority to the collective than to himself/herself. Only then will corporate values and goals be aligned with a greater good and supersede the current number-one priority of profitability and higher valuations.. A recipe for the betterment of the planet will be followed only when the heart is open and becomes the guiding principle. Until then, such a recipe serves as an external fix to a world with an internal problem and is therefore useless.

    • Signals | Jun 16, 2014 at 1:38 am

      cooperative constituents are imindedly/intelligently orchestrated;; systems, volitionally spurred to ensure survival and maximze safety

      Earlier dinosaurs likely perished from their bulk, numbers and diminishing food supplies.

      • ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 10:49 pm

        Or perhaps some reduction of carbon and maybe intensity of oxygen and heat that seems to have been a part of literally living much larger? Might a similar change result over a long period geologically speaking, in like a micro world of tiny men and tiny plants and tiny bugs and tiny husbandry etc.? More to the point that I have puzzled over- where is the granularity boundary condition to microness? at what point if any does the scalability end of atomi legoland?

        And really- it is the scalability that most earliest in adaptations across a variety of conditons – that most soon breaks down the adaptability of a system…

        I think there’s a better way 5to describe this and more and more fitting terminology I could use to describe idea, but I think it is an important consideration, especially in the remaking of the world. What makes a system successful? what is a system?

        These are important directions I think we need to apply attention to as for the pursuit and exploration of permaculture, and especially before leaping into designs based principally upon any assumptions so heavily reliant on unsettled and rather disputable scientific theory!

        Back to scalability! Look to not only the model of the body in nature, which I oft am drawn to point to (and with?) but to the small scale systems of permaculure that are working, that look like they are scalable. As for governance, I’ve found that like Common law built upon natural law to be magnificentally- going on essentially what is to me time immemorial — superbly scalable, yet requiring some degree of SELF_RELIANCE constructing the STRENGTH solidarity; i.e. the definition of a court, behind me, my suit, and these guys that are with me on my assertion of facts, where your guys, and let’s settle this in a civilized manner!— such a scalable system has florished basically for milennia and catches on, I would argue. A good idea needs no patent, and can even necessitate itself before any reasonable faced with the same or similar circumstance!

        And then you have roman law, where this notion of the force and efficiency multiplier risk distributive & risk diminutive idea of a trust, as a collaborative structure, and the coorporation being a vehicale for men to do more with less.

        Those also have shown be be remarkably scalable- but also- indeed, the point I always come to is the free market idea that will the potential negative ( as defined by ?) effects of- and the example I frequently note is toxicity, and and the sorts of insidious slow creeping or genetic tertiary effecting delayed reaction sorts of things- does this, when falling outside of the direct experiential lifespan and sphere of direct experiencee of most potential actors, fall outside of a critical feedback loop of the free market? And quite importantly, how do FREEMEN together establish such a determination!!!!!? AND AGREE UPON IT for the benefit of each other!? Because otherwise what you have is intolerance and the offense of force in an enforcement of opinion, or what is ostensibly an opnion of some, of one, and what validity does that have with the many other than note for consideration and subsequent acceptance or rejection!

        The world is persuasional at the very root by nature I think, and all intelligence everywhere at ANY LEVEL of scalability is ULTIMATELY FREE and must very much so be, else the universe would have LONG AGO squelched and squalored in it’s own palid insufferableness of insufficiency strangled by it’s own breach of the fundamental principle of strength to the each piece-autonomy to invoke the will of volitional harmony….

        I should say that I mean to assert that particles, basicness of nature, whatever- is intelligent and possesses some degree of volition, or more importantly I think it seems as we experience it- exhibits a degree of willingness, and beautiful loving harmonious initiative.

        So- things like that are important to consider is the proposed ideas and topics!

        ediblesound

        • ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 11:55 pm

          ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 10:49 pm

          Or perhaps some reduction of carbon and maybe also of an intensity of oxygen and heat that seems to have been a part of literally living much larger? Might a similar change result over a long period geologically speaking, in like a micro world of tiny men and tiny plants and tiny bugs and tiny husbandry etc.? More to the point that I have puzzled over- where is the granularity boundary condition to microness? at what point if any does the scalability end of atomi legoland?

          And really- Perhaps a thought is that maybe often it is the scalability that most earliest in adaptations across a variety of conditions – that most soon breaks down the adaptability of a system…

          (might that pattern then not fit what I want to regard as a “system”, then?)

          I think there’s a better way to describe this and more and more fitting terminology I could use to describe idea, but I think it is an important consideration, especially in the remaking of the world. What makes a system successful? what is a system?

          These examples are important directions I think we need to apply attention to as for the pursuit and exploration of permaculture, and especially before leaping into designs based principally upon any assumptions so heavily reliant on so unsettled and rather disputable scientific theory!

          Back to scalability! Look to not only the model of the body in nature,(footnote 1) which I oft am drawn to point to (and with?), but to the small scale systems of permaculture that are working, that look like they are scalable!

          As for governance, I’ve found that that like Common law built upon natural law to be magnificentally- going on essentially what is to me time immemorial — superbly scalable, yet I think (as with anything worthwhile, ) requiring some degree of SELF_RELIANCE constructing the STRENGTH underlying that of solidarity; i.e. the definition of a court, being me, my suit, and these guys that are with me on my assertion of facts, ( and the record, and the seal); so now where are your guys,. etc., and let’s settle this disputed controversy in a civilized manner!— such a magnificently scalable system has florished basically for milennia and catches on, I would argue, because it so closely harmonizes with nature. A good idea needs no patent to catch on ( perhaps driving the need for a patent???!!!), and can even necessitate itself before any reasonable faced with the same or similar circumstance!

          And then you have roman law, where this notion of the force and efficiency multiplier risk distributive & risk diminutive idea of a trust, as a collaborative and abstract structure, and the coorporation being a vehicle for men to do more with less. ( much important for consideration there, that I am still studying!)

          Those also have shown be be remarkably scalable- but also- indeed, the point I always come to is in the inescapably free market this idea that: will the potential negative ( as defined by ?) effects of- and the example I frequently note is slow toxicity, and the sorts of insidious slow creeping or genetic tertiary effecting delayed reaction sorts of things- does this, when falling outside of the direct experiential lifespan and sphere of direct experience and care of most and reasonable potential actors, fall outside of a critical( or important, to subsequent generations in the case of the natural law) feedback loop of the free market/natural law? And quite importantly, how do FREEMEN together establish such a determination!!!!!? AND AGREE UPON IT for the benefit of each other!? Because otherwise what you have is intolerance and the offense of force in an enforcement of opinion, or what is ostensibly an opnion of some, of one, and what validity does that have with the many other than note for consideration and subsequent acceptance or rejection!

          The world is persuasional at the very root by nature I think, and all intelligence everywhere at ANY LEVEL of scalability is ULTIMATELY FREE and must very much so be, else the universe would have LONG AGO squelched and squalored in it’s own palid insufferableness of insufficiency strangled by it’s own breach of the fundamental principle of strength to the each piece-autonomy to invoke the will of volitional harmony….

          I should say that I mean to assert that particles, basicness of nature, whatever- is intelligent and possesses some degree of INTRINSIC volition, or more importantly I think it seems as we experience it- exhibits a degree of willingness, and beautiful loving harmonious initiative.

          So- things like that are important to consider, given the proposed ideas and topics of the where I post this!

          ediblesound, 2nd edit

          (footnote 1)

          ( but also to healthy sustainable emergences of permaculture of varying integratedness with varying degrees of redundancy and interreliance; as it I think is the centralized stretched out over archedness interdependancy of knowledge, will, ability, resources, and sense that threatens in theory the system, at least as I ideate it looking out across society, threatens the super endurability and expansionary superbeautyabilityness of society and the things we have today set up- and furthur on that- I see that we have naturally expressly made much progress in the application of the ford idea of mass production, for a leveraging, and maybe people have gone to great extent theorizing and exploring these ideas, but there are it seems to me quantumific levels of restfulness and new lunge- where industriousness in it’s reach reaches these decades a state of statefulness and risks decrepitness without now the lunge towards healthy reintegration of new technologies and new ways of doing new things with the underlying practica of life and living- but that’s all on that what I’ll call the integration implication of new technologys and life practicality)

          ( Monday, June 16, 2014 at 5:53:20 PM as seen from UTC – 6 hours)

          • ediblesound | Jun 17, 2014 at 12:08 am

            And long term- I guess it might be a matter of maintaining a sustainable stupidity, for the irony in that humbly says it all when it is me and the big other of nature I am!! Actually I would rather promote the optionallity of co-intelligence

            ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 11:55 pm

            ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 10:49 pm

            Or perhaps some reduction of carbon and maybe also of an intensity of oxygen and heat that seems to have been a part of literally living much larger? Might a similar change result over a long period geologically speaking, in like a micro world of tiny men and tiny plants and tiny bugs and tiny husbandry etc.? More to the point that I have puzzled over- where is the granularity boundary condition to microness? at what point if any does the scalability end of atomi legoland?

            And really- Perhaps a thought is that maybe often it is the scalability that most earliest in adaptations across a variety of conditions – that most soon breaks down the adaptability of a system…

            (might that pattern then not fit what I want to regard as a “system”, then?)

            I think there’s a better way to describe this and more and more fitting terminology I could use to describe idea, but I think it is an important consideration, especially in the remaking of the world. What makes a system successful? what is a system?

            These examples are important directions I think we need to apply attention to as for the pursuit and exploration of permaculture, and especially before leaping into designs based principally upon any assumptions so heavily reliant on so unsettled and rather disputable scientific theory!

            Back to scalability! Look to not only the model of the body in nature,(footnote 1) which I oft am drawn to point to (and with?), but to the small scale systems of permaculture that are working, that look like they are scalable!

            As for governance, I’ve found that that like Common law built upon natural law to be magnificentally- going on essentially what is to me time immemorial — superbly scalable, yet I think (as with anything worthwhile, ) requiring some degree of SELF_RELIANCE constructing the STRENGTH underlying that of solidarity; i.e. the definition of a court, being me, my suit, and these guys that are with me on my assertion of facts, ( and the record, and the seal); so now where are your guys,. etc., and let’s settle this disputed controversy in a civilized manner!— such a magnificently scalable system has florished basically for milennia and catches on, I would argue, because it so closely harmonizes with nature. A good idea needs no patent to catch on ( perhaps driving the need for a patent???!!!), and can even necessitate itself before any reasonable faced with the same or similar circumstance!

            And then you have roman law, where this notion of the force and efficiency multiplier risk distributive & risk diminutive idea of a trust, as a collaborative and abstract structure, and the coorporation being a vehicle for men to do more with less. ( much important for consideration there, that I am still studying!)

            Those also have shown to be remarkably scalable- but also- indeed, the point I always come to is in the inescapably free market this idea that: will the potential negative ( as defined by ?) effects of- and the example I frequently note is slow toxicity, and the sorts of insidious slow creeping or genetic tertiary effecting delayed reaction sorts of things- does this, when falling outside of the direct experiential lifespan and sphere of direct experience and care of most and reasonable potential actors, fall outside of a critical( or important, to subsequent generations in the case of the natural law) feedback loop of the free market/natural law? And quite importantly, how do FREEMEN together establish such a determination!!!!!? AND AGREE UPON IT for the benefit of each other!? Because otherwise what you have is intolerance and the offense of force in an enforcement of opinion, or what is ostensibly an opnion of some, of one, and what validity does that have with the many other than note for consideration and subsequent acceptance or rejection!

            The world is persuasional at the very root by nature I think, and all intelligence everywhere at ANY LEVEL of scalability is ULTIMATELY FREE and must very much so be, else the universe would have LONG AGO squelched and squalored in it’s own palid insufferableness of insufficiency strangled by it’s own breach of the fundamental principle of strength to the each piece-autonomy to invoke the will of volitional harmony….

            I should say that I mean to assert that particles, basicness of nature, whatever- is intelligent and possesses some degree of INTRINSIC volition, or more importantly I think it seems as we experience it- exhibits a degree of willingness, and beautiful loving harmonious initiative.

            So- things like that are important to consider, given the proposed ideas and topics of the where I post this!

            ediblesound, 2nd edit

            (footnote 1)

            ( but also to healthy sustainable emergences of permaculture of varying integratedness with varying degrees of redundancy and interreliance; as it I think is the centralized stretched out over archedness interdependancy of knowledge, will, ability, resources, and sense that threatens in theory the system, at least as I ideate it looking out across society, threatens the super endurability and expansionary superbeautyabilityness of society and the things we have today set up- and furthur on that- I see that we have naturally expressly made much progress in the application of the ford idea of mass production, for a leveraging, and maybe people have gone to great extent theorizing and exploring these ideas, but there are it seems to me quantumific levels of restfulness and new lunge- where industriousness in it’s reach reaches these decades a state of statefulness and risks decrepitness without now the lunge towards healthy reintegration of new technologies and new ways of doing new things with the underlying practica of life and living- but that’s all on that what I’ll call the integration implication of new technologys and life practicality)

            ( Monday, June 16, 2014 at 5:53:20 PM as seen from UTC – 6 hours)
            Third edit

            And the thing is- The other that is also natural, begin (being) also free, all undesired must be let be, lest there be reason for it given in the world of thy glee

            copyleft, me;-} All Natural Preserved

          • ediblesound | Jun 17, 2014 at 3:21 am

            ediblesound | Jun 17, 2014 at 12:08 am
            ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 11:55 pm
            ediblesound | Jun 16, 2014 at 10:49 pm

            Or perhaps some reduction of carbon and maybe also of an intensity of oxygen and heat that seems to have been a part of literally living much larger? Might a similar change result over a long period geologically speaking, in like a micro world of tiny men and tiny plants and tiny bugs and tiny husbandry etc.? More to the point that I have puzzled over- where is the granularity boundary condition to microness? at what point if any does the scalability end of atomi legoland?

            And really- Perhaps a thought is that maybe often it is the scalability that most earliest in adaptations across a variety of conditions – that most soon breaks down the adaptability of a system…

            (might that pattern then not fit what I want to regard as a “system”, then?)

            I think there’s a better way to describe this and more and more fitting terminology I could use to describe idea, but I think it is an important consideration, especially in the remaking of the world. What makes a system successful? what is a system?

            These examples are important directions I think we need to apply attention to as for the pursuit and exploration of permaculture, and especially before leaping into designs based principally upon any assumptions so heavily reliant on so unsettled and rather disputable scientific theory!

            Back to scalability! Look to not only the model of the body in nature,(footnote 1) which I oft am drawn to point to (and with?), but to the small scale systems of permaculture that are working, that look like they are scalable!

            As for governance, I’ve found that that like Common law built upon natural law to be magnificentally- going on essentially what is to me for time immemorial — superbly scalable, yet I think (as with anything worthwhile:) requiring some degree of SELF_RELIANCE constructing the STRENGTH underlying that of solidarity; i.e. the definition of a court, being me, my suit, and these guys that are with me on my assertion of facts, ( and the record, and the seal); so now where are those with you,. etc., and let’s settle this disputed controversy in a civilized manner!— such a magnificently scalable system has florished basically for milennia and catches on, I would argue, because it so closely harmonizes with nature! A good idea needs no patent to catch on ( perhaps driving the need for a patent???!!!), and can even necessitate itself before any reasonable faced with the same or similar circumstance!

            And then you have roman law, where I encounter documentation of this notion of the ship/private governance force and efficiency multiplier risk distributive & risk diminutive idea of a trust, as a collaborative and abstract structure, and the coorporation (interesting misspelling) being a vehicle for men to do more with less (Managing the ever present horizon of nature, and the specifically the nature of the inextricable autonomy (and anonymity) of an individual among and of men) . ( much important for consideration there, that I am still studying!)

            Those also have shown to be remarkably scalable- but also- indeed, the point I recently frequently have come to in ponderance and consideration is: in the inescapably free and natural market/ transformation of location/kinetics cosmos, this idea that: will the potential negative ( as defined by ?) effects of— and the example I frequently note is slow toxicity, and the sorts of insidious slow creeping or genetic tertiary effecting delayed reaction sorts of things- does this, when (if,!!) falling outside of the direct experiential lifespan (applicable? and discerning from natural acts based on what, how? necessarily requiring positive law coonstruction and abstraction, or?) and sphere of direct experience and interest/care of most and reasonable potential actors, fall outside of a critical( or important, to subsequent generations in the case of the natural law) feedback loop of the free market/natural law? And quite importantly, how do FREEMEN together establish such a determination!!!!!? AND AGREE UPON IT for the benefit of each other, and expectedly the theoretical future!? Because otherwise what you have is intolerance and the offense of force in an enforcement of opinion, or what is ostensibly an opnion of some, of one, and what validity does that have with the many other than note for consideration and subsequent acceptance or rejection!

            The world is persuasional at the very root by nature I think, and all intelligence everywhere at ANY LEVEL of scalability is ULTIMATELY FREE and must very much so be, I think, else the universe would have LONG AGO squelched and squalored in it’s own palid insufferableness of insufficiency (let alone inefficiency and degraced deplorative state) strangled by it’s own breach of the fundamental principle of meridian strength to the each piece-autonomy to invoke the will of volitional harmony….

            I should say that I mean to assert that particles, ultimate adamantine basicness of nature, whatever- is intelligent and possesses some degree of INTRINSIC volition, or more importantly I think it seems as we experience it- exhibits a degree of willingness, and beautiful loving harmonious initiative.

            So- things like that are important to consider, given the proposed ideas and topics of the where I post this!

            ediblesound, 2nd edit

            (footnote 1)

            ( but also to healthy sustainable emergences of permaculture of varying integratedness with varying degrees of redundancy and interreliance; as it I think is the centralized stretched out over archedness interdependancy of knowledge, will, ability, resources, and sense that threatens in theory the system, at least as I ideate it looking out across society, threatens the super endurability and expansionary superbeautyabilityness of society and the things we have today set up- and furthur on that- I see that we have naturally expressly made much progress in the application of the ford idea of mass production, for a leveraging, and maybe people have gone to great extent theorizing and exploring these ideas, but there are it seems to me quantumific levels of restfulness and new lunge- where industriousness in it’s reach reaches these decades a state of statefulness and risks decrepitness without now the lunge towards healthy reintegration of new technologies and new ways of doing new things with the underlying practica of life and living- but that’s all on that what I’ll call the integration implication of new technologys and life practicality)

            ( Monday, June 16, 2014 at 5:53:20 PM as seen from UTC – 6 hours)
            Third edit

            And the thing is- The other that is also natural, begin (being) also free, all undesired must be let be, lest there be reason for it given in the world of thy glee

            copyleft, me;-} All Natural Preserved

            Your comment is awaiting moderation.

            ediblesound | Jun 17, 2014 at 12:08 am

            And long term- I guess it might be a matter of maintaining a sustainable partially localized perperspective (stupid, limited?)?, for the irony in that humbly says it all when it is me and the big other of nature I am!! Actually I would rather promote the optionallity of co-intelligence seemlesslyintegrated for the maximal experience of preference!

            ( Monday, June 16, 2014 at 5:53:20 PM as seen from UTC – 6 hours)
            forth & fifth edit 201406162046z-06
            201406162116z-06

            And the thing is- The other that is also natural, begin (being) also free, all undesired must be let be, lest there be reason for it given in the world of thy glee

            copyleft, me;-} All Naturally Observed

  • ediblesound | Jun 15, 2014 at 2:13 pm

    How might you “buy” stock of a syndicate? Would you have to work there and thus “own” the fruits of “your” labor? Might the answer already be there in the usufructuary interests held by all? Seems to me that it is futile to peel open a rose to get it to “bloom” before the system emerges in bloom!
    ediblesound

    • ediblesound | Jun 15, 2014 at 2:59 pm

      Systems theory, and inavoidability of anarchocapitalism. Because who will do anything but someone, likely! how do you control everyone? Control the choices available? How do you control that? It’s an endsome game, to think that the beauty of evolution’s explorative tips and fingers of experimentation, the noble beauty of individuation and variation could be standardized and thus eliminated or conformed! The miracle of existence to begin with is the balance of the extremes of points of individualized perception with the spirit all synergistic perception experienceable as mutuality, and transpersonal transempathy! To Move as a metaorganism is inavoidable, but to do so sentiently requires the tipping point percentage of a guiding critical percentsome of such, I think! I have written much on the subject and am working towards finding a way to best make that available at least in an effective manner. If I could optionally select parts of the gmail account to become part of the g+1 whatever blog thing then that could be an easy way to make raw content available without reposting, resending, rewriting etc.

      Another thing: Seems to me the very saving nature of reality IS the INSATIABLILITY and the universal appetite for always more, always better, always new, as a mantra of excellence. We have the base “materials” / chances/ opportunities / abilitites/ to work with to begin with, I do think we have evidence suggesting an uhnlimited supply to IMAGINATION, interoperability, innovation, adaptation; and with that as a recipee, I think we have a chance, and that it is unwise to assume a hopelessness or forebodingness of looming self-destruction! I’d much rather direct concentration towards possibilty, creativity, practicality, optimal maximization of the little potential miracles of the intricacies and nuances of what particles CAN do that we already have found a seeming unendingness of in the “physical” universe! Perhaps such a plan involves faith in something bigger than we all, and that may very well be, WE ALL! ;^)

  • ediblesound | Jun 15, 2014 at 3:09 pm

    Use this version:
    Systems theory, and inavoidability of anarchocapitalism. Because who will do anything but someone, likely! how do you control everyone? Control the choices available? How do you control that? It’s an endsome game, to think that the beauty of evolution’s explorative tips and fingers of experimentation, the noble beauty of individuation and variation could be standardized and thus eliminated or conformed! The miracle of existence to begin with is the balance of the extremes of points of individualized perception with the spirit all synergistic perception experienceable as mutuality, and transpersonal transempathy! To Move as a metaorganism is inavoidable, but to do so sentiently requires the tipping point percentage of a guiding critical percentsome of such, I think! I have written much on the subject and am working towards finding a way to best make that available at least in an effective manner. If I could optionally select parts of the gmail account to become part of the g+1 whatever blog thing then that could be an easy way to make raw content available without reposting, resending, rewriting etc.

    Another thing: Seems to me the very saving nature of reality IS the INSATIABILITY and the universal appetite for always more, always better, always new, as a mantra of excellence. We have the base “materials” / chances/ opportunities / abilitites/ to work with to begin with, I do think we have evidence suggesting an uhnlimited supply to IMAGINATION, interoperability, innovation, adaptation; and with that as a recipee, I think we have a chance, and that it is unwise to assume a hopelessness or forebodingness of looming self-destruction! I’d much rather direct concentration towards possibilty, creativity, practicality, optimal maximization of the little potential miracles of the intricacies and nuances of what particles CAN do that we already have found a seeming unendingness of in the “physical” universe! Perhaps such a plan involves faith in something bigger than we all, and that may very well be, WE ALL! ;^)

    LOVE

    *

    ~=\\=~

    *

    · • • ·

    Perhaps it may be worthwhile for any at any time encountering this in whole or any intelligible part to consider the possibility, even the very likelihood that:

    Content from this address does not necessarily constitute or consist of anything actionable; and the expressions which may be conveyed by the content from this address do not necessarily represent the views of anyone identifiable and most likely are from another point in time and therefore are limited to a possibly but not necessarily continuing instance of likeness to the continuing instance of expressing possibly expressed in this particular content.

  • ediblesound | Jun 15, 2014 at 3:26 pm

    I find it helpful to review the FINAL PRODUCT to continually improve it! ;+)
    Use This Version:
    ediblesound | Jun 15, 2014 at 3:09 pm

    Use this version:
    Systems theory, and inavoidability of anarchocapitalism. Because who will do anything but someone, likely! how do you control everyone? Control the choices available? How do you control that? It’s an endsome game, to think that the beauty of evolution’s explorative tips and fingers of experimentation, the noble beauty of individuation and variation could be standardized and thus eliminated or conformed! The miracle of existence to begin with is the balance of the extremes of points of individualized perception with the spirit all synergistic perception experienceable as mutuality, and transpersonal transempathy! To Move as a metaorganism is inavoidable, but to do so sentiently requires the tipping point percentage of a guiding critical percentsome of such, I think!

    Another thing: Seems to me the very saving nature of reality IS the INSATIABILITY and the universal appetite for always more, always better, always new, as a mantra of excellence. We have the base “materials” / chances/ opportunities / abilitites/ to work with to begin with, I do think we have evidence suggesting an unlimited supply of IMAGINATION, interoperability, innovation, adaptation; and with that as a recipee, I think we have a chance, and that it is unwise to assume a hopelessness or forebodingness of looming self-destruction! I’d much rather direct concentration towards possibilty, creativity, practicality, optimal maximization of the little potential miracles of the intricacies and nuances of what particles CAN do that we already have found a seeming unendingness of in the “physical” universe! Perhaps such a plan involves faith in something bigger than we all, and that may very well be, WE ALL! ;^)

    LOVE

    *

    ~=\\=~

    *

    · • • ·

    Perhaps it may be worthwhile for any at any time encountering this in whole or any intelligible part to consider the possibility, even the very likelihood that:

    Content from this address does not necessarily constitute or consist of anything actionable; and the expressions which may be conveyed by the content from this address do not necessarily represent the views of anyone identifiable and most likely are from another point in time and therefore are limited to a possibly but not necessarily continuing instance of likeness to the continuing instance of expressing possibly expressed in this particular content.

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

  • Signals | Jun 15, 2014 at 10:14 pm

    APART FROM AN ESSENTIAL ULTIMATELY CHARACTERIZED COSMIC INTERASSOCIATION HUMANITY WOULD OTHERWISED PERISH

    Fukushima further underscores the worsening humanly insurmountable plight

    916 978 4020 24/7 [leave a comment]

  • Signals | Jun 16, 2014 at 4:46 am

    Also Daniel since early human collaboration occurred for better protection, we can collaborate for yet more qualitative achievements as you allude; for yet greater yet unrealized attainments. Right?.

    Dangers yet abound; since the aspirations are too limited, not inclusive enough.

    With regard for all

    ==================================

  • Signals | Jun 16, 2014 at 4:57 am

    That we can yet choose to affect planetary destiny, is apparent
    but iintelligent ethically guided actions are still essentials

    Also Daniel since early human collaboration occurred for better protection, we can collaborate for yet more qualitative achievements as you allude; for yet greater yet unrealized attainments. Right?.

    Dangers yet abound; since the aspirations are too limited, not inclusive enough.

    With regard for all

    ==================================

    t and requires intelligently and morally and ethically guided action .

  • aaa | Jan 12, 2015 at 4:52 pm

    Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished
    to say that I’ve really loved surfing around your weblog posts.

    After all I’ll be subscribing for your feed and I’m hoping you write again very soon!

Post A Comment

Skip to toolbar